[GitHub] [spark] kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter

kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27888#issuecomment-599816416 Thanks for all reviewers with all generous review & comments! :)

[GitHub] [spark] kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter

kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27888#issuecomment-599470082 > That's a correct behavior in `case-sensitive mode`, isn't it? Given the original schema

[GitHub] [spark] kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter

kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27888#issuecomment-599419426 > following, but it was `JSON` (`Relation[StructColumn#329] json`). Could you confirm your failure

[GitHub] [spark] kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter

kimtkyeom commented on issue #27888: [SPARK-31116][SQL] Fix nested schema case-sensitivity in ParquetRowConverter URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27888#issuecomment-599002449 > Hi, @kimtkyeom . Could you revise once more? @dongjoon-hyun OK. I'll revise soon.