rdblue commented on pull request #31475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31475#issuecomment-776119870
@MaxGekk, thanks. Then let's work on updating this to fit more cleanly with
the design of v2 catalogs and tables. This should be a `Table` interface, not
an extension to
rdblue commented on pull request #31475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31475#issuecomment-775490751
@MaxGekk, can you share the use case that you have for this? You mentioned
truncation-specific optimizations. I think working with concrete use cases is
usually a good idea. If
rdblue commented on pull request #31475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31475#issuecomment-775318833
@MaxGekk, why is this necessary instead of deleting from the table or
overwriting everything with no new records? I don't see a good reason to do
this, especially at the catalog