[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-29 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged to master --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-29 Thread skonto
Github user skonto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 @srowen Could you please merge? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-29 Thread skonto
Github user skonto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 @srowen could you merge please? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62939/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62939 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62939/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62939 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62939/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62937 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62937/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62937/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62937 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62937/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-27 Thread mgummelt
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Rebased and upgraded to Mesos 1.0.0 rather than 0.28.2, since a) it's out now!, and b) we need support for unified containerizer caching FYI @skonto Ready to merge

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62841 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62841 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62840 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62840 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-25 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Looks like one more last comment, and needs a rebase after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-24 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 OK, looks good to me too though I don't really know about Mesos. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-23 Thread skonto
Github user skonto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62735/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62735 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62735/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62735 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62735/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-22 Thread mgummelt
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 @srowen ready for re-review --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-22 Thread skonto
Github user skonto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 @srowen Could you pls check and merge? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62695/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62695 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62695/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62694/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62694 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62694/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62695 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62695/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62694 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62694/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread mgummelt
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 good eye. fixed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread skonto
Github user skonto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test "supports spark.mesos.driverEnv.*" fails.

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62686/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62686 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62686/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62686 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62686/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62685/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62685 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62685/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread mgummelt
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 @skonto rebased and ready for re-review --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62685 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62685/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62684 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62684/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62684/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62684 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62684/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-21 Thread skonto
Github user skonto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 I tested it against our test suite it works fine. Have you tested it with an image: spark.mesos.executor.docker.image? Do you have a sample image? --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-19 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62569 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62569/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62569/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-19 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 **[Test build #62569 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62569/consoleFull)** for PR 14275 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #14275: [SPARK-16637] Unified containerizer

2016-07-19 Thread mgummelt
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275 cc @skonto --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if