[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-29 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @srowen sure, please refer to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14404 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-29 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Darn, this breaks 1.6, because the test doesn't compile. I'll revert it in 1.6. @breakdawn if you're willing, could you open a PR vs 1.6 that updates the test to work in that branch? --- If your pr

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-29 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Merged to master/2.0/1.6 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature e

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62920/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 **[Test build #62920 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62920/consoleFull)** for PR 14324 at commit [`b3f60fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 **[Test build #62920 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62920/consoleFull)** for PR 14324 at commit [`b3f60fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-27 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Jenkins add to whitelist --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-27 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Jenkins retest this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishe

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 **[Test build #62876 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62876/consoleFull)** for PR 14324 at commit [`0d6c29b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-26 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62876/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-26 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature e

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 **[Test build #62876 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62876/consoleFull)** for PR 14324 at commit [`0d6c29b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-26 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Jenkins test this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-25 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @rxin @srowen Anything i can follow? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enab

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-23 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @lw-lin Personally, multiple classes way is smoother base on current implementation. But no matter in what way, it's a big change, maybe it's better to open another jira issue to involve more disc

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-23 Thread lw-lin
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @breakdawn what else can we do to actually fix the ≥ 8118 cols issue? We're actually running out of the constant pool when we compile the generated code. So maybe compile it into multiple classes?

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-23 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @lw-lin umm, thanks for pointing it out. Since the limit is 8117, 1 will fail, that case needs a update. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-23 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 There are actually _55_ occurrences of this type of problem in the code base. I think I will open a PR separately to fix them. It might or might not cause a problem in practice in other cases, but ma

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-23 Thread lw-lin
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @breakdawn yes that's a different issue and I'm looking into it. Regarding what this PR tries to fix, could you run this PR's change against [this test case](https://github.com/apache/spark/

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-23 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 8118 cols limit due to janino, the exception like following, might be another story at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodeGenerator$.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$expre

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-22 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @lw-lin You're right, thanks for your suggestion. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-22 Thread lw-lin
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 @breakdawn it'd be great to do more tests when you open a request. As I'm investigate into this too, I found that my same fix works for 201 cols but fails for 8118 cols. The exact limit is 8117. --

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-22 Thread breakdawn
Github user breakdawn commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Yes, working on that --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes s

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-22 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Can you add a test case? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes s

[GitHub] spark issue #14324: [SPARK-16664][SQL] Fix persist call on Data frames with ...

2016-07-22 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14324 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat