Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Merging to master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64867/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
**[Test build #64867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64867/consoleFull)**
for PR 14938 at commit
[`b57bbb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
I just compared the wide schema benchmark on master with this patch and
there do not seem to be performance regressions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
**[Test build #64867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64867/consoleFull)**
for PR 14938 at commit
[`b57bbb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64859/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
**[Test build #64859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64859/consoleFull)**
for PR 14938 at commit
[`7ab9de0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Lgtm. I wonder if it's also useful to set the truncation threshold lower in
test? Though maybe that's a nuisance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
10 matches
Mail list logo
