[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65981/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 **[Test build #65981 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65981/consoleFull)** for PR 15239 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 I am having a problem with running `cran-check.sh` locally. Please understand trying some fixes with Jenkins. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 **[Test build #65981 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65981/consoleFull)** for PR 15239 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 **[Test build #65978 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65978/consoleFull)** for PR 15239 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65980/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 **[Test build #65980 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65980/consoleFull)** for PR 15239 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65978/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 **[Test build #65980 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65980/consoleFull)** for PR 15239 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-27 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 **[Test build #65978 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65978/consoleFull)** for PR 15239 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-26 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 > I'm a bit worry about the function signature changes - could we have some tests for before/after? @felixcheung just to make sure, you mean some tests like the ones in

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-26 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 also, you would need to add `@param ...` doc to pass the CRAN tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark issue #15239: [SPARK-17665][SPARKR][WIP] Support options/mode all for ...

2016-09-26 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239 great, thanks. - we should consolidate the write.* function to use a helper to avoid code duplication - I'm a bit worry about the function signature changes - could we have some tests