Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67228 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67228/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
[`b83a606`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67202/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67202/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
[`c942084`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
The current change LGTM (pending Jenkins). It would be great to check the
usage as @tejasapatil said.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
I meant scala's `zipWithIndex()` and not `RDD.zipWithIndex`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67202/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
[`c942084`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
@tejasapatil I check the code where reference `RDD.zipWithIndex`, there are
7 usages currently. Because current test data won't generate big enough
partition so they don't triggers the bug. The
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67170/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67170/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
[`18c3f49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Have you looked for other places in the codebase which would also produce
wrong result by using scala's `zipWithIndex()` ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67170/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
[`18c3f49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
13 matches
Mail list logo
