Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Can you use "SPARK-16609" instead of "Spark-16609"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69645/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #69645 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69645/consoleFull)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #69645 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69645/consoleFull)**
for PR 16138 at commit
