Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
This is getting pretty close. Can you update the description to define more
formally semantics for timezone?
In addition, I think we also need to have a follow-up pr to focus on data
sources
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70359/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70359/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70359/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70348/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70348/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70348/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70338/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70338/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
I'd rename all the zoneId to timeZoneId to reduce confusion ..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70254/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70254/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70244/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70244/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70242/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70242/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
@rxin Did you mean I should add a document to `sql-programming-guide.md`
file or somewhere else, or describe it here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70244/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Can you document the semantics of time zones and when they are used?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70242/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
I'd like to discuss the boundary of session local timezone.
I assumed it affects only in `DataFrame` operations, neither in `Dataset`
operations, before import from `RDD`, after export
29 matches
Mail list logo
