Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
thanks!
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74559/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #74559 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74559/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`8ec7cd0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #74559 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74559/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`8ec7cd0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
that's ridiculous ... dot in names is the norm
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/utils/html/read.table.html
anyway
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74507/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #74507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74507/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`d01f952`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #74507 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74507/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`d01f952`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Let me go for `as.json.object`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
seems like `object` is the right term in JSON lango - how about
`as.json.object`? otherwise `as.json.array` (the opposite) or
`as.json.object.array` might be good option
---
If your project is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
How about `as.struct`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
> array might be a bit vague - does that require the column value to be a
JSON array, or just multiple JSON object spanning multiple line?
Yup, it requires that input is a JSON array (mu
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Thank you @felixcheung. Let me try to handle the comments soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
a couple of thoughts
- a default FALSE parameter might be less intuitive - do you think we could
come up with a default TRUE parameter (ok, `single`?)
- if it's asX, typically it would be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74326/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #74326 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74326/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`5c2450d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
@felixcheung, I tried to add an optional parameter, `asArray`. Could you
take a look and see if it makes sense?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #74326 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74326/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`5c2450d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73997/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #73997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73997/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`10feb9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
**[Test build #73997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73997/testReport)**
for PR 17178 at commit
[`10feb9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/10
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
@felixcheung, this is a bit different with what we talked but I opened this
because I thought you might like this more. This takes the type string given to
`structField` now. If you are worried
26 matches
Mail list logo
