Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Thanks a lot for the second update! This LGTM
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75517/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #75517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75517/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #75517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75517/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75448/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #75448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75448/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #75448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75448/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
The major thing I'm concerned is that `transform` will have to recompute
the association rules each time it's invoked. If that's not a problem,
changing association rules to method would be much
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Thanks for this PR! Do you think it's worth adding the caching logic? I'm
now wondering if we should change associationRules into a method which
recomputes the DataFrame every time it is
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
ping @jkbradley as this is something we should fix before release.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74995/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #74995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74995/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #74995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74995/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74752/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #74752 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74752/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #74752 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74752/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
ping @jkbradley and @srowen to be aware of the issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
21 matches
Mail list logo
