Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19143
okay, do you mean I need to change the title?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19143
You haven't actually added tests, and that's not all this PR does. At the
least, this doesn't match the intent you describe, and should be closed. I'd
back up and describe the test you want in the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19143
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19143
@srowen Actually, I think this one makes sense. Because the two open test
cases are tested, we connect the Cartesian product and the broadcast nested
loop join. When we understand the two
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19143
Leave a comment
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19143
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
