Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
According to our discussion, I close this, @srowen .
Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83565/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
**[Test build #83565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83565/testReport)**
for PR 19686 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
Thank you for review. Yes. Technically, the previous one is not wrong. It
means an unordered set of attributes. So it's minor.
In both
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
Why is the order important here? Wasn't obvious to mr
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19686
**[Test build #83565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83565/testReport)**
for PR 19686 at commit
