Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Also, a better title for this PR would be:
```
Generate additional constraints for Join's children
```
---
-
To
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Agree with that @cloud-fan proposed to have constraints for a plan and the
children. However, that requires a relative wider change as well as a find set
of test cases, please don't be hesitate
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Good catch! This is a real problem, but the fix looks hacky.
By definition, I think `plan.contraints` should only include constraints
that refer to `plan.output`, as that's the promise a
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
@srowen i redescribe the problem. Now i hive a small table `ls` with one
row , and a big table `catalog_sales` with One hundred billion rows. And in the
big table, the non null value about
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
This is still lacking detail about 'why'. It's not my area either. I think
you should not have reopened this.
---
-
To
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
**[Test build #87651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87651/testReport)**
for PR 20670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87651/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
**[Test build #87651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87651/testReport)**
for PR 20670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1038/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
@SparkQA i think this error is not caused by my patch. please ok to test.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
@srowen @wangyum help me review, thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
**[Test build #87648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87648/testReport)**
for PR 20670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87648/
Test FAILed.
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
