Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
@gatorsmile @maropu Thank you very much !!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
Thanks! Merged to master/2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89918/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
**[Test build #89918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89918/testReport)**
for PR 21174 at commit
[`e6e9397`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/2712/
Tes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
**[Test build #89918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89918/testReport)**
for PR 21174 at commit
[`e6e9397`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e6
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
@gatorsmile Thanks a lot. Addressed the comments.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For addi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
This fix is safe for us to backport to the previous versions. To achieve a
better performance, we can start a separate job to execute these subqueries. :
)
---
---
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
@maropu So with the fix, if the query predicate contains an scalar subquery
expression, then that expression is not considered for partition pruning. For
example, if the predicate was , part_ke
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21174
One question; we have no risk to miss any partition pruning by this fix?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.a
13 matches
Mail list logo
