Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
merged to master and 2.3, thanks @pgandhi999
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
+1
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@pgandhi999 thank you for your comments.
LGTM, then let me ask @zsxwing and @JoshRosen for their comments
---
-
To
Github user pgandhi999 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@kiszk I have added some more details in the PR description. Thank you.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
We would appreciate it if you would describe some detail on `further
analysis` for removing lock on the whole object.
> On further analysis of the heartbeat receiver method, it turns out
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95216/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #95216 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95216/testReport)**
for PR 1 at commit
