Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9973
Checked it with @huaxingao who worked for JDBC driver team before. Yeah, we
are unable to do it using JDBC. In my previous team, we did it using the native
connection methods instead of JDBC. It s
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9973
Oh, can you really have a transaction across connections somehow? I didn't
think that was possible in general. I agree that this is really the ideal
behavior but don't know how to implement it in JDBC
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9973
The basic problem is multiple connections work on the same transaction. It
is doable but might not be applicable as a general JDBC data source connector.
Let us keep it as an open problem. If nece
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9973
You're right but lots of output semantics are per partition. I don't think
we can do the update in one transaction no matter what. This improves the
behavior in many cases so is worthwhile behavior bu
