Github user tedyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-157122774
> Sounds like we should prevent the call to StreamingContext#stop() in the
listener bus's thread.
> How about setting a ThreadLocal Boolean to indicate to StreamingCo
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156964895
Sounds like we should prevent the call to StreamingContext#stop() in the
listener bus's thread.
How about setting a ThreadLocal Boolean to indicate to StreamingContext
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156936613
I'm going to revert those commits now to try to unbreak the SBT builds.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156935359
IMO, we should revert
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3e0a6cf1e02a19b37c68d3026415d53bb57a576b
The user should not call `stop` or other long-time work in
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156911334
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: Test failed with compression using codec
org.apache.spark.io.LZ4CompressionCodec:
assertion failed: expected groupByKey to spill, b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156910699
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156910680
**[Test build #45973 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45973/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`cd9b2f2`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156910700
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156891548
**[Test build #45973 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45973/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`cd9b2f2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889821
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889817
**[Test build #45968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45968/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`8be6a7c`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889820
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889393
**[Test build #45968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45968/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`8be6a7c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156888586
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156888544
**[Test build #45962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45962/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`cb4132d`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156888587
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156887216
It's possible that there's a cleaner way to fix the original bug that
motivated the incorrect patch vs. trying to patch up the problems introduced by
the fix by layeri
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156887130
I'd like @zsxwing to help take a look at this and figure out whether this
is a sufficient fix or whether we should revert your original patch and go back
to the drawin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156885497
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156885496
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156885494
**[Test build #45966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45966/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`3df8051`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156885326
**[Test build #45966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45966/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`3df8051`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156877667
**[Test build #45962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45962/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`cb4132d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156870248
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156870241
**[Test build #45961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45961/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`e208c5f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156870251
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156869057
**[Test build #45961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45961/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
[`e208c5f`](https://gith
GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723
[SPARK-11572] Process outstanding requests after seeing stop flag
This is to address the regression Josh discovered.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull h
29 matches
Mail list logo
