Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157903703
Thanks @zsxwing , merging this to master and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157863731
**[Test build #46238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46238/consoleFull)**
for PR 9805 at commit
[`d87a5e6`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157863927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157863926
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157847716
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157847087
**[Test build #46238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46238/consoleFull)**
for PR 9805 at commit
[`d87a5e6`](https://gith
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157846597
That's funny! How come the leak did not cause downstream failures?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#discussion_r45252508
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/TrackStateByKeySuite.scala
---
@@ -436,6 +437,41 @@ class TrackStateByKeySuite extends SparkFun
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#discussion_r45249165
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/TrackStateByKeySuite.scala
---
@@ -436,6 +437,41 @@ class TrackStateByKeySuite extends SparkFunSui
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#discussion_r45236372
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/TrackStateByKeySuite.scala
---
@@ -436,6 +437,41 @@ class TrackStateByKeySuite extends SparkFun
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157805199
I just noticed `TrackStateByKeySuite` leaks a SparkContext. Could you fix
it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157683585
@zsxwing Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157682855
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157682856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157682747
**[Test build #46209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46209/consoleFull)**
for PR 9805 at commit
[`77f8ee1`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157681942
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157681943
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157681828
**[Test build #46208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46208/consoleFull)**
for PR 9805 at commit
[`8d0a494`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157671290
**[Test build #46209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46209/consoleFull)**
for PR 9805 at commit
[`77f8ee1`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805#issuecomment-157669825
**[Test build #46208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46208/consoleFull)**
for PR 9805 at commit
[`8d0a494`](https://gith
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9805
[SPARK-11814][Streaming]Add better default checkpoint duration
DStream checkpoint interval is by default set at max(10 second, batch
interval). That's bad for large batch intervals where the checkpoint
22 matches
Mail list logo
