Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-169166570
Merged to master/1.6/1.5. I'll keep an eye on the 1.5 build to make sure
that cherry pick still worked OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user BrianLondon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-169164791
Sounds good to me. Once done, I'll rebase 12269 and reopen that discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168958835
Given the discussion here, I'm pretty confident in this change and would
like to go ahead and merge it. It will also unblock further fixes in 12269.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168752808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168752806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168752644
**[Test build #48668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48668/consoleFull)**
for PR 10492 at commit
[`137bafd`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168742194
**[Test build #48668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48668/consoleFull)**
for PR 10492 at commit
[`137bafd`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168738742
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user BrianLondon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168704102
@srowen space removed. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168381598
@JoshRosen are you OK with the reasoning above?
@BrianLondon sorry but the style checker doesn't like the white space on
the blank line you added to trigger tests :(.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168075091
**[Test build #2270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2270/consoleFull)**
for PR 10492 at commit
[`8e80f5e`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-168073660
**[Test build #2270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2270/consoleFull)**
for PR 10492 at commit
[`8e80f5e`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-167543175
@JoshRosen it's not the scope that's an issue but the version. Not
specifying it lets the SDK version required by the Kinesis client come in at
whatever it needs to be.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-167486919
Instead of just omitting the dependency, what about marking it as provided?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492#issuecomment-167480578
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user BrianLondon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10492
[SPARK-12453][Streaming] Remove explicit dependency on aws-java-sdk
Successfully ran kinesis demo on a live, aws hosted kinesis stream against
master and 1.6 branches. For reasons I don't enti
17 matches
Mail list logo
