Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48869485
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1863,6 +1863,17 @@ object functions extends LegacyFunctions {
*/
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168801707
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48778819
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -177,3 +179,44 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168614902
**[Test build #48644 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48644/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168614906
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168614909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168652917
**[Test build #48656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48656/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168614140
**[Test build #48644 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48644/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48808255
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1863,6 +1863,17 @@ object functions extends LegacyFunctions {
*/
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168877190
I've merged this. You can address the API comment in the next pull request.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48808153
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1863,6 +1863,17 @@ object functions extends LegacyFunctions {
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168856535
**[Test build #48699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48699/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168876234
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168876055
**[Test build #48699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48699/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168876233
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168674438
**[Test build #48656 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48656/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168674649
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168674651
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168700418
I think we should open another PR to use this hash expression in
`Exchange`, as it will break a lof of tests and make it harder to review.
---
If your project is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48705398
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48703350
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48705356
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48676826
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168125552
**[Test build #48542 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48542/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168134147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168134146
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168123375
**[Test build #48540 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48540/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48646962
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48646170
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168128676
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168128648
**[Test build #48540 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48540/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168128675
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48646183
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -177,3 +179,44 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48646861
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168047956
On the contrary I think we should consider not using hash code on an
object, and always use hash code expression for two reasons:
1. We still need a hash function
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168072275
It makes sense to still have a Hash expression (called more specifically,
Mumur3Hash) that does what this patch originally intended. I think this will be
a useful
GitHub user cloud-fan reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435
[SPARK-12480][SQL] add Hash expression that can calculate hash value for a
group of expressions
The hash algorithm is based on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168134068
**[Test build #48542 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48542/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-168017519
Closing, will open another PR to use `UnsafeRow.hashCode` for shuffle and
fix tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48554681
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,223 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167918200
**[Test build #48442 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48442/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48588221
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,229 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48589312
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,229 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48587902
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,229 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167932291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167932253
**[Test build #48442 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48442/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167932288
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167747465
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167747467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167747137
**[Test build #48404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48404/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48527967
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,223 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48528123
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,223 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48537829
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +179,223 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167698232
**[Test build #48388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48388/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167583523
need some help about the R test, I can't see the expected result through
the error log...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48482588
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +178,221 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167614804
I see
```
1. Failure (at test_sparkSQL.R#1160): group by, agg functions
--
30 not equal to collect(max(gd))[1, 2]
30 - 19 == 11
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48500689
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +178,221 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48500881
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +178,221 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48502287
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +178,221 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167710232
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167710215
**[Test build #48388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48388/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167710233
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167713829
Actually I have already created a pr #9883 for this long time ago...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167727788
**[Test build #48399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48399/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48516214
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +178,221 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48516332
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -176,3 +178,221 @@ case class Crc32(child: Expression)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167737270
**[Test build #48404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48404/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167730354
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167730331
**[Test build #48399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48399/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167730352
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167399420
**[Test build #48352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48352/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167403074
**[Test build #48352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48352/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167403091
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167403090
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167395236
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396600
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396598
**[Test build #48349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48349/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396601
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396554
**[Test build #48349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48349/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396643
**[Test build #48350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48350/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396684
**[Test build #48350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48350/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396686
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167396685
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167447980
**[Test build #48356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48356/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167452745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167452744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167452730
**[Test build #48356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48356/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167338506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167338507
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167338499
**[Test build #48346 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48346/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167328998
**[Test build #48346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48346/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167329447
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167329445
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167246248
**[Test build #48325 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48325/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167251759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167251754
**[Test build #48325 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48325/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167251758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
