Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167643456
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167645225
O.K, I'll merge this into `master` and `branch-1.6`. Thanks @wyaron !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167160783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167160782
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167160752
**[Test build #48314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48314/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167202451
> I have committed the proposed change which moves setName after the map.
I've tested locally and now the name field is valid.
>
> does it make sense ?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167150757
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167150758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167150742
**[Test build #48313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48313/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user wyaron commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167151653
Thanks for the quick CR !
Apparently, the new unit test has just failed for sc.wholeTextFiles(...) :-)
My guess is that it was broken in commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167153204
**[Test build #48314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48314/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141253
**[Test build #48313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48313/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#discussion_r48422742
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#discussion_r48422480
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141665
**[Test build #48312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48312/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141687
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141686
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#discussion_r48422596
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167134036
**[Test build #48312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48312/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167119034
**[Test build #48307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48307/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167119039
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167116755
**[Test build #48305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48305/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167116757
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167116759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167118255
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167118257
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167116647
**[Test build #48305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48305/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167118885
**[Test build #48307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48307/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167119036
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167121063
**[Test build #48309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48309/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167127195
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167127192
**[Test build #48310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48310/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167127194
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167121216
**[Test build #48309 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48309/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167121221
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167121220
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167127048
**[Test build #48310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48310/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
38 matches
Mail list logo
