Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-182781589
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-182374205
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-182374195
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-182373439
**[Test build #51033 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51033/consoleFull)**
for PR 10978 at commit
[`a715794`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-182322826
**[Test build #51033 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51033/consoleFull)**
for PR 10978 at commit
[`a715794`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-182317731
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181780428
OK, I'm convinced. I'll leave it open for a bit to see if anyone wants to
comment on the change, but seems like a straightforward 'port' to the Java API.
There a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181776497
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181776494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181776124
**[Test build #50959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50959/consoleFull)**
for PR 10978 at commit
[`a4ae59f`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181742056
**[Test build #50959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50959/consoleFull)**
for PR 10978 at commit
[`a4ae59f`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181739481
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#discussion_r52273190
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaSparkContext.scala ---
@@ -774,6 +774,16 @@ class JavaSparkContext(val sc: SparkContext)
Github user flyjy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181688265
@srowen Thank you very much for your suggestions. The way you suggested is
clearer but the previous PR is relatively simpler. The existing codes have
passed the test code
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#discussion_r52116967
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaSparkContext.scala ---
@@ -774,6 +774,17 @@ class JavaSparkContext(val sc: SparkContext)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-176609044
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user flyjy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978
[SPARK-13074][Core] Add JavaSparkContext. getPersistentRDDs method
The "getPersistentRDDs()" is a useful API of SparkContext to get cached
RDDs. However, the JavaSparkContext does not have this API.
18 matches
Mail list logo
