Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-198152244
Ping @vazin, what about the current fix, would you please review again,
thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-198463862
That vazin guy must be wondering why he was pinged. :-) Sorry, I've been
busy with other things, I'll try to take a look today.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-198513672
LGTM, merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197209163
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197209169
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197208742
**[Test build #53282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53282/consoleFull)**
for PR 11721 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197207834
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197207836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197207642
**[Test build #53281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53281/consoleFull)**
for PR 11721 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197168676
**[Test build #53282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53282/consoleFull)**
for PR 11721 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#discussion_r56285494
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -133,12 +133,9 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197167540
**[Test build #53281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53281/consoleFull)**
for PR 11721 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#discussion_r56284175
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -374,12 +374,6 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197156547
I think `SchedulerExtensionService` can still be worked, since I still
maintain the full attempt id in `YarnScheduler`, only change to the simple
counter for Spark
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-197074328
LGTM aside from small comment.
@steveloughran should take a look since IIRC he wanted the full attempt id
for something.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#discussion_r56263000
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -374,12 +374,6 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-196780449
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-196780452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-196780179
**[Test build #53183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53183/consoleFull)**
for PR 11721 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721#issuecomment-196731895
**[Test build #53183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53183/consoleFull)**
for PR 11721 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11721
[SPARK-13885][YARN] Fix attempt id regression for Spark running on Yarn
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This regression is introduced in #9182, previously attempt id
22 matches
Mail list logo
