Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50955230
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50955760
Hey on this one - it's helpful to see what this looks like - but my
instinct is actually to move away from scala-logging entirely. We can upgrade
ourselves, but all
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50955929
I accidentally merged this in lieu of another patch. The merge has been
reverted.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50957000
How to re-open this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332#issuecomment-50961153
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332#issuecomment-50961189
QA tests have started for PR 332. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17767/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332#issuecomment-50962790
QA results for PR 332:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50965670
@pwendell #1208 fits your idea?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user witgo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50851936
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50852101
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17651/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50856657
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50867057
@witgo Some of the failure was just Jenkins acting up again (what could be
behind the Address already in use suddenly? for all of these tests), but
there is a MIMA
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50910604
@srowen Thank you for your comments. And how to modify `GenerateMIMAIgnore`
file to exclude a method? An example?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50915292
@witgo have a look at `project/MimaExcludes.scala`. Under the section
starting with `case v if v.startsWith(1.1) =` you can add a `Seq()` with all
the excludes necessary
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50920280
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50951603
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50953076
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50847196
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17639/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50847358
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17640/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-50847534
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-49034870
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16679/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-49049288
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48714364
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
25 matches
Mail list logo
