Github user naftaliharris commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#discussion_r15568446
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -63,7 +63,10 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel(LinearModel):
def predict(self, x):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#discussion_r15567017
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -63,7 +63,10 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel(LinearModel):
def predict(self, x):
Github user naftaliharris commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#discussion_r15541942
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -63,7 +63,10 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel(LinearModel):
def predict(self, x):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49542158
QA results for PR 1493:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49540259
QA tests have started for PR 1493. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16867/consoleFull
---
If
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49540207
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49515915
QA tests have started for PR 1493. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16849/consoleFull
---
If
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49515870
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49504244
QA tests have started for PR 1493. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16847/consoleFull
---
If
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#issuecomment-49504102
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493
[SPARK-2552][MLLIB] stabilize logistic function in pyspark
to avoid overflow in `exp(x)` if `x` is large.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://git
12 matches
Mail list logo
