Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-157353135
Yes, ideally. @JoshRosen am I right that we have to add the new method to
the `JavaRDDLike` trait or the abstract class that implements it in order to
avoid binary
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-157335532
This is such a noisy change for really little gain that I don't think it's
worth it. At best just ensure there is a getNumPartitions in each language.
---
If your
Github user schot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-157352481
Although it would be nice to fix the inconsistencies in the usage of
partitions.length vs partitions.size, I agree that its better to stick to just
adding
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-157327010
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user schot opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767
[SPARK-3580] Add Consistent Method To Get Number of RDD Partitions Across
Different Languages
I have tried to address all the comments in pull request
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447.
