Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-65734742
This looks good to me, since I think that there's no reason to download the
temporary file to a different directory than its intended destination. I'd
like to be able
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-65015813
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-65016199
[Test build #23968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23968/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-65019860
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-65019858
[Test build #23968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23968/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user preaudc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-63969515
I have no clue what could bring this MiMa test failure, and how to fix it.
Can anybody give me a hand?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-63698467
[Test build #23617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23617/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-63712137
[Test build #23617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23617/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-63712145
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user preaudc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-62119248
As @ryan-williams pointed out, this is initially only a workaround to
SPARK-3967.
I have still no idea why the move fails (with a {{Permission denied}}) when
the
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-62072713
Hey @preaudc can you explain how this fixes SPARK-3967?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-62073026
Also, how does this relate to #2848? Can you and @ryan-williams sort out
which PR makes more sense?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user ryan-williams commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-62076919
#2484 seems beneficial no matter what; why would we ever copy a JAR we've
just confirmed is identical to the thing already at the destination?
---
If your project
Github user ryan-williams commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-62077177
I don't think these two PRs are necessarily that related though, other than
each having been borne as a workaround to the same stack-trace. There may be a
common
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61476791
[Test build #22815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22815/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61478546
[Test build #22816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22816/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user preaudc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61479433
I've just resync my local fork so that the patch merges cleanly (i.e. there
are no other modifications compared to the initial patch)
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61489693
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61489683
[Test build #22815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22815/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61491002
[Test build #22816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22816/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-61491020
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-60823800
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-60824330
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22374/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-60838290
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22374/consoleFull)
for PR 2855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-60838296
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-60014023
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user preaudc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855
[SPARK-3967] Ensure that files are fetched atomically
tempFile is created in the same directory than targetFile, so that the
move from tempFile to targetFile is always atomic
You can merge this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#issuecomment-59722947
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
28 matches
Mail list logo
