Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63549732
Okay pulling this in - thanks davies!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63598077
merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user davies closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467516
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467643
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467709
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467763
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467790
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467830
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467888
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467846
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467949
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20467968
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20468037
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63382985
Super cool. I left mostly minor comments. Otherwise it LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20468318
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20468419
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63383666
@davies @pwendell The three-stage solution looks reasonable to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20468644
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63385857
The new thing for multiple stages is really nice. I also think the new
architecture is great. I made some minor comments, but overall looks good.
On thing, does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63388317
[Test build #23506 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23506/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63389665
@pwendell @andrewor14 I should had addressed you comments, please have
another look, thanks!
This should work in SQL Cli, also in Windows.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63389796
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63399151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63399144
[Test build #23506 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23506/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20414049
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20414069
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20414182
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/ConsoleProgressBar.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63244719
Hey @davies - I played with this a bit and I actually found the behavior
around concurrent stages might not be great. The reason is that the set of
active stages will
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63244854
By the way, @squito, I don't think this can go through log4j, it needs to
access the jline console interface directly. This feature will just be
controlled by a flag
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20414302
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20414811
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63249917
[Test build #23442 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23442/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63251889
@pwendell @kayousterhout It can show mutiple stages (at most 3) in one
line in the same time now, it looks like
```
[Stage 0: (316 + 4) /
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63251878
[Test build #23448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23448/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63253165
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63253164
[Test build #23442 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23442/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63254820
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63254818
[Test build #23448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23448/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63257525
[Test build #23454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23454/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63261422
[Test build #523 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/523/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63261770
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63261768
[Test build #23454 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23454/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204439
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204436
[Test build #23434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23434/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204432
[Test build #23434 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23434/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204653
[Test build #521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/521/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204768
@JoshRosen @pwendell @kayousterhout @squito I had re-implemented it
using the new poll based progress api. The progress bar is much simplified as
the original one,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204747
[Test build #23436 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23436/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204911
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63204979
[Test build #23437 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23437/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63206309
[Test build #521 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/521/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63206407
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63206404
[Test build #23436 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23436/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63206787
[Test build #23438 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23438/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63206812
[Test build #23437 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23437/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63206817
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63208927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63208925
[Test build #23438 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23438/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-63149772
Sorry for my delay in responding ...
(a) I think this DOES add a lot of value over the std INFO logging. One
log line per task completion is *much* noisier than
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20112947
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -554,12 +627,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62454596
This is a very nifty feature. However, it's not great to have modifications
to the TaskSetManager and other scheduler internals for this
presentation-related logic. It
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20112968
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -569,6 +641,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r20112906
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -528,7 +601,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62458897
This is definitely a cool/useful feature! A few things:
(1) As Patrick alluded to, I think it could and should be able to
implemented as a SparkListener,
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62473806
@pwendell @kayousterhout , Thanks for review this.
Console is a character device, all the graph are implemented as an stream
of characters. It's very hard to show
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62474857
I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but what if the progress bar printed a
new line each time it advanced, and just used the normal logging
infrastructure? So
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62475673
I was just about to suggest the same thing . So I admit it seemed a lot
cooler to have the console keep updating, but I agree with their concerns.
As a slight
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62476320
@squito that's a good idea with the minimum time interval to avoid
unnecessary clutter!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62480890
@kayousterhout @squito The motivation of this PR is to allow user to see
the progress without flushing away their input/output, so it's better to have a
one-line progress
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62499404
I totally see the appeal of the one-progress bar (hence my initial
excitement when I tried this out). But if it doesn't play nicely with logging
multiple stages, this
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62503514
But if it doesn't play nicely with logging multiple stages, this seems
like a very small improvement for the initial user experience, but a big
headache for serious
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-62330615
this is awesome!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61581372
[Test build #22845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22845/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61581788
[Test build #22846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22846/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61583786
[Test build #22850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22850/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61587953
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61587948
[Test build #22846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22846/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61588063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61588061
[Test build #22845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22845/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61589372
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61589367
[Test build #22850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22850/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61359587
[Test build #22685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22685/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61359713
@JoshRosen I had make some improvements: 1) finished the bar before print
the result in scala shell 2) can interwave with logging better(will not
overwrite each other) 3)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61360811
[Test build #22685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22685/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61360812
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r19702287
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -521,6 +529,51 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r19702293
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -521,6 +529,51 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r19702297
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -521,6 +529,51 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r19709497
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -521,6 +529,51 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393355
[Test build #22737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22737/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393375
[Test build #22737 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22737/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393376
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393558
[Test build #22739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22739/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61394840
[Test build #22739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22739/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61394842
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r19697163
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -521,6 +528,47 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61340878
[Test build #22656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22656/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61349714
**[Test build #22656 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22656/consoleFull)**
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61349718
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
