Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86807495
LGTM pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86823849
[Test build #29277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29277/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86823880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86807377
[Test build #29277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29277/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86817620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86805660
[Test build #29273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29273/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86834844
LGTM - merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86817610
[Test build #29273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29273/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86803042
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#discussion_r27274352
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -49,10 +49,20 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
with
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#discussion_r27274319
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -49,10 +49,20 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86772772
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86772747
[Test build #29260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29260/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86775680
[Test build #29262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29262/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86775705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86753012
[Test build #29262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29262/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#issuecomment-86751037
[Test build #29260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29260/consoleFull)
for PR 5218 at commit
GitHub user mccheah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218
[SPARK-6405] Limiting the maximum Kryo buffer size to be 2GB.
Kryo buffers are backed by byte arrays, but primitive arrays can only be
up to 2GB in size. It is misleading to allow users to set
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5218#discussion_r27271009
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -49,10 +49,20 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
with
20 matches
Mail list logo
