Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104445146
Actually I will submit a PR against your branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104387588
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104387586
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104387559
[Test build #33254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33254/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`d625a64`](https://git
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30827288
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/JavaDataFrameSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30827249
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/JavaDataFrameSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30826509
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/JavaDataFrameSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30825871
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30825693
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30825654
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30825593
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30825618
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30824995
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104361358
[Test build #33254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33254/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`d625a64`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30824246
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Window.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30824198
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/JavaDataFrameSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104360261
@rxin Updated!
But still need to add `scaladoc`, before I doing this, can you review the
interface again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104360416
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-104360376
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103804810
+1 for a window function as i suggest above
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103801621
Ok toColumn - I think it'd make sense to just add a "window" function that
creates a new WindowFunctionSpec, and then follow my original API design for
the WindowFunctionSp
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103800518
@chenghao-intel I'm really confused. Why don't you just follow the API I
wrote on SPARK-7322? It pollutes the namespace much less (no need to add
orderby, partitionby to fu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103338811
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103338813
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103338799
[Test build #33047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33047/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`06a29b8`](https://git
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30569160
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -291,6 +291,269 @@ object functions {
def max(columnName: String): Column = m
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30568983
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30568519
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30568419
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -291,6 +291,269 @@ object functions {
def max(columnName: String):
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30567233
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30567024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30566922
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30566606
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -291,6 +291,269 @@ object functions {
def max(columnName: String): Column = m
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103313786
Thank you @scwf for reviewing this, I've updated the code to hide the
properties of the `WindowFunctionDefinition`, and for giving a better name
instead of the `W
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103313630
[Test build #33047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33047/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`06a29b8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103313514
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103313530
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30564975
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -291,6 +291,269 @@ object functions {
def max(columnName: String):
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30564674
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30564645
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30564615
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30564605
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30563451
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30563276
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30563125
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30563029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30562926
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -291,6 +291,269 @@ object functions {
def max(columnName: String): Column = m
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103286602
@rxin, how about merge this PR first if you feel the API looks good? And I
or someone else can add the python APIs in another PR, (I am not familiar with
Python,
Github user ogirardot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-103172055
Is it possible to merge this for 1.4 ? I'd really need this :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102974323
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102974241
[Test build #32974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32974/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`3dc8d09`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102974333
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102952684
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102952682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102952648
[Test build #32969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32969/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`4553993`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102937501
[Test build #32974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32974/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`3dc8d09`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102937320
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102937305
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102928275
[Test build #32969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32969/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`4553993`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102928135
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102928142
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102822253
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102822254
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102822247
[Test build #32939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32939/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`dab001a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102820902
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102820903
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102820900
[Test build #32938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32938/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`58fb7f9`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102820006
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102820007
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102819992
[Test build #32937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32937/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`c76d5b5`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102811289
[Test build #32939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32939/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`dab001a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102810879
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102810850
Thank you @scwf I've updated the code to hide the `.toColumn`, and also fix
the bug of specifying the `FrameType`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102810874
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102810456
[Test build #32938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32938/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`58fb7f9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102809816
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102809768
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102808081
[Test build #32937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32937/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`c76d5b5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102807805
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102807810
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#discussion_r30460024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/WindowFunctionDefinition.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102600214
i think the `over` method of Column should also return `Column`, just like
other methods of Column. So i suggest the api is more like this:
```
df.select(
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102592274
Let me think about it. The toColumn at the end is very ugly...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102458053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102458056
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102458042
[Test build #32831 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32831/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`523bf9a`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102423128
[Test build #32831 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32831/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`523bf9a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102422315
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102422240
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102421362
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102421348
[Test build #32829 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32829/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`0d745f5`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102421359
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102420438
[Test build #32829 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32829/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`0d745f5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102419989
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102419958
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102416276
@rxin @yhuai , any comments on the API design? Then I can start the rest of
the work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102416301
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102416305
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6104#issuecomment-102416298
[Test build #32827 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32827/consoleFull)
for PR 6104 at commit
[`a4da7fe`](https://git
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
