Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-113054219
Thanks. Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-113067087
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112910402
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112910156
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112910383
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112911047
[Test build #35051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35051/consoleFull)
for PR 6828 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112940276
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112940239
[Test build #35051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35051/console)
for PR 6828 at commit
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32599952
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32601130
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112682097
@chenghao-intel, yes, I've noticed `struct` `named_struct` when I'm
implementing this and just wandering whether we should implement both.
The previous test
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112692973
`named_struct` is not implemented in Spark SQL right? At least, it should
be registered in `FunctionRegistry`. Of course we can leave it for the future.
---
If
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32602451
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112662507
There are 2 Struct UDFs in Hive:
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/generic/GenericUDFStruct.java
(struct)
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112663074
BTW that's would be great if you can add the `NamedStruct` support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32596894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-111984097
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user yijieshen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828
[SPARK-8283][SQL] Resolve udf_struct test failure in HiveCompatibilitySuite
This PR aimed to resolve udf_struct test failure in HiveCompatibilitySuite.
Currently, this is done by loosening
18 matches
Mail list logo
