Github user concretevitamin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#discussion_r14215683
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -67,73 +62,72 @@ case class HashJoin(
@transient lazy val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47166566
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47166548
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47173833
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47173837
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16125/
---
If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47181980
Sounds good.
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014, Michael Armbrust notificati...@github.com
wrote:
Thanks, I've merged this into master. I did not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47025832
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47025844
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47025961
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47025962
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16066/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47028882
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47028898
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47029490
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47029471
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47030068
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16070/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47030067
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47033189
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47033655
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47033670
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#discussion_r14158383
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala ---
@@ -27,10 +27,14 @@ import parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputFormat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47037838
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16068/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47037837
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47037892
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47038154
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47038170
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47039036
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16071/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47039034
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47042142
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47042143
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16074/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045191
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045181
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045423
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045426
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16075/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045612
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045868
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47045857
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#discussion_r14164580
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -67,73 +62,72 @@ case class HashJoin(
@transient lazy val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47050969
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16082/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47050968
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47051632
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-47051636
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16083/
---
If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-46764177
Closing in favor of: #1163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user concretevitamin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13941073
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13941129
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user concretevitamin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13941218
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13941730
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-45312913
Should this go in now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-45357748
We should at least add some tests before merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user xiaocai00 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13019713
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13019926
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* :: DeveloperApi
Github user xiaocai00 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13022952
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13022986
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* :: DeveloperApi
Github user xiaocai00 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r13024562
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r12927830
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* :: DeveloperApi
Github user xiaocai00 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#discussion_r12868794
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +136,68 @@ case class HashJoin(
/**
* ::
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42895233
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42895257
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42901210
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42901213
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14907/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42779419
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42779387
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42779382
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-42779420
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14890/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734
[SQL] SPARK-1800 Add broadcast hash join operator
WIP: A few things remain, but looking for feedback on this approach.
- [ ] Figure out how to configure this. The immutability of
66 matches
Mail list logo
