GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603
ConnectionManager throws out of Could not find reference for received ack
message xxx exception.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603#issuecomment-50237469
QA tests have started for PR 1603. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17221/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603#issuecomment-50237601
QA results for PR 1603:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603#issuecomment-50237979
QA tests have started for PR 1603. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17223/consoleFull
---
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603#issuecomment-50238872
Does the movement of the status modification into the synchronized block
change anything? It seems the only effective change here is downgrading an
exception to a log
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603#issuecomment-50239511
Throw an exception here cause
`System.exit(ExecutorExitCode.UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION)` is called.
This is not necessary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1603#issuecomment-50240022
QA results for PR 1603:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
