Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64907431
Jenkins, test this please. LGTM pending tests - this just pulls in clean-up
from upstream.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64907914
[Test build #23939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23939/consoleFull)
for PR 3224 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64914989
[Test build #23939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23939/consoleFull)
for PR 3224 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64788339
@JoshRosen ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user KaiXinXiaoLei reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224
Delete unnecessary function
when building spark by sbt, the function ârunAlternateBoot in
sbt/sbt-launch-lib.bash is not used. And this function is not used by spark
code. So I think
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64384870
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64385026
The file from https://github.com/sbt/sbt-launcher-package is changed. And
the function ârunAlternateBoot is deleted in upstream project. I think
spark project
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-64385336
The file from https://github.com/sbt/sbt-launcher-package is changed. And
the function ârunAlternateBoot is deleted in upstream project. I think spark
project
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-62883101
OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user KaiXinXiaoLei opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3223
Delete unnecessary function.
when building spark by sbt, the function ârunAlternateBoot in
sbt/sbt-launch-lib.bash is not used. And this function is not used by spark
code. So I think
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3223
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-62693270
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user KaiXinXiaoLei opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224
Delete unnecessary function
when building spark by sbt, the function ârunAlternateBoot in
sbt/sbt-launch-lib.bash is not used. And this function is not used by spark
code. So I think this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-62694334
I believe this file is cloned from the SBT project. While this might or
might not be used by Spark, it's probably easiest to not delete it, so as to
make updating the
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3224#issuecomment-62777549
Yeah, this file is from https://github.com/sbt/sbt-launcher-package. Maybe
it's not necessary, but I'd rather not think about / review changes to this
third-party
17 matches
Mail list logo
