Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38534171
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13423/
---
If your
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38592694
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38600307
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13437/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38600305
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38601404
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38601384
Failure was in recovery with file input stream.recovery with file input
stream -- Something that I think is completely unrelated to this change. So
lets try again ...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38601510
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38608422
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13440/
---
If your project
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38608715
Looks good, thanks for the change - makes things cleaner.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user shivaram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219
Fix scheduler to account for tasks using 1 CPUs.
Move CPUS_PER_TASK to TaskSchedulerImpl as the value is a constant and use
it in both Mesos and CoarseGrained scheduler backends.
Thanks
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#discussion_r10915292
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
//
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#discussion_r10915339
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
//
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#discussion_r10915407
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
//
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38524982
FYI - there was a test failure in TaskSetManagerSuite as a unit test was
checking for availableCpus being zero. So I added back a non-zero check in
TaskSetManager.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38526638
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13414/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38526636
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38526736
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38527171
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13417/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38527170
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38529622
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38529627
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38529626
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#discussion_r10917822
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -388,7 +385,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#issuecomment-38531549
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13421/
---
If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#discussion_r10918164
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -388,7 +385,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/219#discussion_r10918370
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
//
26 matches
Mail list logo
