Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62452045
Mind closing this @svar29
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62320554
I agress w/ TD, I don't think this change is necessary. I think we should
close this and, @svar29 , maybe you can discuss the problem you are running
into on the
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62224082
Any thoughts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62226551
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62227453
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user svar29 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141
SPARK-4276 fix for two working thread
Spark streaming requires at least two working threads.But example in
spark/examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/NetworkWordCount.scala
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62020356
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3141#issuecomment-62087166
Why is this change needed? IF you run the example through bin/run-example,
it should the SparkConf should be automatically populated with a master of
local[*], which sets
