Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-77246969
I commented on the JIRA. This LGTM as an immediate fix - clearly the
property is not correct in the published 2.11 poms.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-77120315
Don't worry about `-e`, I think. Does the command work to replace just the
first occurrence on GNU `sed`? I can dig out a linux box but just wondered if
you knew already.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#discussion_r25760252
--- Diff: dev/change-version-to-2.10.sh ---
@@ -17,4 +17,7 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
find . -name 'pom.xml' | grep -v target \
-
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-77168087
Hmm.. I was trusting our effective pom trick was working properly. Forgot
the JIRA id for that though.
On Mar 4, 2015 6:10 PM, Sean Owen
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-77169399
Based on your comments and this issue I am going to take a deeper look
tomorrow again. Meanwhile if you are rushed with respect to this PR. Looks like
a good
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-76969712
[Test build #28234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28234/consoleFull)
for PR 4876 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876
SPARK-5143 [BUILD] [WIP] spark-network-yarn 2.11 depends on
spark-network-shuffle 2.10
Update `scala.binary.version` prop in POM when switching between Scala
2.10/2.11
@ScrapCodes for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-76987849
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-76987840
[Test build #28234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28234/consoleFull)
for PR 4876 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#discussion_r25752030
--- Diff: dev/change-version-to-2.10.sh ---
@@ -17,4 +17,7 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
find . -name 'pom.xml' | grep -v target \
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4876#issuecomment-77097244
I am not a sed wizard, was just going through the man page. It does not say
anything about -e being POSIX or non POSIX - sadly!. I do not have a mac, so no
clues
12 matches
Mail list logo
