Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-102940913
(That's fine -- you can also just rebase and force-push the existing
branch/PR. The advantage there is that it retains the discussion in a single
PR. But no big deal
Github user JihongMA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6226#issuecomment-103219142
sorry, it is done now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6226
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JihongMA closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JihongMA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-102902698
sorry, I was busy and missed this message. I created a new pull request,
which rebased the change with latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-102364796
@JihongMA this needs a rebase now, and has an unrelated change? if you make
it just about updating the lz4 version, I'll merge it for master.
---
If your project is set
Github user linlin200605 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-96861052
I just found out there are changes introduced in 1.3.0 which are not
backward compatible with JDK6, if supporting JDK6 is a must, then we can
consider to target it
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-96774945
@linlin200605 any update on this? java 7 bytecode can't even be loaded in
java 6. It's not an API question. If not we have to close this I'm afraid or at
least target it
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-96780950
@srowen yeah maybe let's close this as a won't fix and just give the
workaround for IBM users to upgrade the dependency themselves.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-96766769
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user linlin200605 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95674803
lz4-1.3.0 needs Java 7 for building the jar, usually not necessarily
require JDK 7 at runtime if there is backward compatibility. I will follow up
on that.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95462973
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95462960
[Test build #30806 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30806/consoleFull)
for PR 5641 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95522827
Looks like this requires Java 7?
https://github.com/jpountz/lz4-java/commits/master
We can't use it if so, but, the tests passed anyway.
It looks like a lot
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95395862
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user linlin200605 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641
SPARK-7063 when lz4 compression is used, it causes core dump
please review this pull request. Thank you!
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95422599
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5641#issuecomment-95423349
[Test build #30806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30806/consoleFull)
for PR 5641 at commit
18 matches
Mail list logo
