Github user chesterxgchen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user chesterxgchen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53211490
Patrick
The release version is incorrect in the YARN pom intentionally (it's a
weird artifact of the way we publish builds).
It would nice that someone
Github user chesterxgchen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53212454
BTW, I have to change the pom.xml in order to fix the unit test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53143937
QA results for PR 2090:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#discussion_r16608088
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBaseSuite.scala
---
@@ -199,10 +199,7 @@ class ClientBaseSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53088236
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53137965
Jenkins, test this please. Thanks LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53142551
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53142581
Wait actually - the current change made to the unit test causes the unit
test to be entirely useless (it just compares the output of a function to
itself.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53142611
QA tests have started for PR 2090. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/19093/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53142606
The release version is incorrect in the YARN pom intentionally (it's a
weird artifact of the way we publish builds). If you want to build branch-1.1
please checkout the
GitHub user chesterxgchen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090
Spark-3177 SPARK-3175
SPARK-3177 : Yarn-alpha ClientBaseSuite Unit test failed
SPARK-3175 : Branch-1.1 SBT build failed for Yarn-Alpha
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2090#issuecomment-53016829
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
13 matches
Mail list logo
