Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699#discussion_r68340566
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -122,6 +123,8 @@ public UnsafeShuffleWriter(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699#discussion_r68184716
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -122,6 +123,8 @@ public UnsafeShuffleWriter(
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699#discussion_r67978652
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeKVExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@
*/
public final class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699#discussion_r67950589
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeKVExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@
*/
public final class
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699#discussion_r67389051
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -122,6 +123,8 @@ public UnsafeShuffleWriter(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699#discussion_r67361641
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -122,6 +123,8 @@ public UnsafeShuffleWriter(
GitHub user sitalkedia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
[SPARK-15958] Make initial buffer size for the Sorter configurable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the initial buffer size in the sorter is hard coded
