Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730#discussion_r67481562
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -351,8 +354,10 @@ private[sql] object
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730#discussion_r67477579
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -351,8 +354,10 @@ private[sql] object
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730#discussion_r67462488
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -339,6 +339,9 @@ private[sql] object
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
[SPARK-16006][SQL] Attemping to write empty DataFrame with no fields throws
non-intuitive exception
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the error
