Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14376
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14376#discussion_r73959574
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WindowExec.scala ---
@@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ private[execution] abstract class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14376#discussion_r73917166
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WindowExec.scala ---
@@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ private[execution] abstract class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14376#discussion_r72458927
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WindowExec.scala ---
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ case class WindowExec(
new
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14376
[SPARK-16749][SQL] Simplify processing logic in LEAD/LAG processing.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The logic for LEAD/LAG processing is more complex that it needs to