Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912#discussion_r77472048
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +172,27 @@ class FilterPushdownSuite ex
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912#discussion_r77427992
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +172,27 @@ class FilterPushdownSuite ex
Github user srinathshankar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912#discussion_r77383932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +172,27 @@ class FilterPushdown
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912#discussion_r77122702
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ class FilterPushdownSuite exten
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912
[SPARK-17357][SQL] Simplified predicates should be pushed down through
operators
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `Optimizer`, Filter operator will go through the rule
