Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r90306255
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -869,6 +891,31 @@ object TestReceiver {
val counter
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r90191359
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -869,6 +891,31 @@ object TestReceiver {
val
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r90191009
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -869,6 +891,31 @@ object TestReceiver {
val
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r90182581
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -869,6 +891,31 @@ object TestReceiver {
val counter
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r89983105
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/SerializerManager.scala ---
@@ -155,7 +155,12 @@ private[spark] class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r89954432
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/SerializerManager.scala ---
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
[SPARK-18617][CORE][STREAMING] Close "kryo auto pick" feature for Spark
Streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#15992 provided a solution to fix the bug, i.e.
