Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725#discussion_r113091533
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitSuite.scala ---
@@ -404,6 +407,37 @@ class SparkSubmitSuite
runSparkSubmit(args)
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725#discussion_r113091328
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2606,8 +2606,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725#discussion_r113091235
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -252,11 +252,17 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725#discussion_r113091382
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitSuite.scala ---
@@ -404,6 +407,37 @@ class SparkSubmitSuite
runSparkSubmit(args)
GitHub user markgrover opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
[SPARK-20435][CORE] More thorough redaction of sensitive information
This change does a more thorough redaction of sensitive information from
logs and UI
Add unit tests that ensure that no
