Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523#discussion_r145892306
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ case class In(value: Expression, li
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523#discussion_r145340100
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ case class In(value: Expression,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523#discussion_r145318964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ case class InMemoryTableSc
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523#discussion_r145306880
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ case class In(value: Expression, lis
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523#discussion_r145307826
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ case class InMemoryTableScanExe
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19523
[SPARK-22301][SQL] Add rule to Optimizer for In with empty list of vaâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For performance reason, we should resolve in operation on
