dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2054056965
Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
mridulm commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2054020151
Thanks @dongjoon-hyun !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
dongjoon-hyun closed pull request #46014: [SPARK-47318][CORE][3.5] Adds HKDF
round to AuthEngine key derivation to follow standard KEX practices
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2053805775
Merged to branch-3.5 for Apache Spark 3.5.2.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2053804650
While double-checking the PR, I'd realized that `3.4.3, 3.5.2` is better
because the column name is `Since Version`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2053803012
Yes, correct
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#discussion_r1561825387)
> we will have to forward port that to master as well.
--
This is an automated message from
mridulm commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2052306349
Sounds good to me for docs @dongjoon-hyun - we will have to forward port
that to master as well.
And I guess we leave the config as 4.0 in code ?
--
This is an automated message
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2052103818
We can follow the Apache Spark Security page convention.
- https://spark.apache.org/security.html
> 3.2.2, or 3.3.1 or later
In this case, maybe, `3.4.3, or 3.5.2 or
mridulm commented on PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#issuecomment-2051007024
My concern with adding `3.4.3` was, that would typically mean it is
available in `3.5.x` - but it wont, except for specific versions of `3.5`.
Should we document it as such ?
--
This
dongjoon-hyun commented on code in PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#discussion_r1561825080
##
docs/security.md:
##
@@ -169,6 +175,12 @@ The following table describes the different options
available for configuring th
2.2.0
+
+
dongjoon-hyun commented on code in PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#discussion_r1561803406
##
docs/security.md:
##
@@ -169,6 +175,12 @@ The following table describes the different options
available for configuring th
2.2.0
+
+
sweisdb commented on code in PR #46014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46014#discussion_r1561814424
##
docs/security.md:
##
@@ -169,6 +175,12 @@ The following table describes the different options
available for configuring th
2.2.0
+
+
12 matches
Mail list logo
