Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#issuecomment-50576705
Sure, sounds good. Did you see my comments on preserving partitions too
though?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#discussion_r15567618
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1239,6 +1239,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/** The
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1434#discussion_r15567656
--- Diff:
extras/spark-kinesis-asl/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/JavaKinesisWordCount.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#issuecomment-50577126
QA results for PR 1639:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-50577245
QA results for PR 1338:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1648#issuecomment-50577269
Jenkins, what are you doing ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user staple commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1592#issuecomment-50577338
Sure, Iâm fine with reworking based on other changes (it seems that some
merge conflicts have already cropped up in master since I submitted my PR last
week). I think
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#issuecomment-50577408
QA tests have started for PR 1639. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17426/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1648#issuecomment-50577383
QA tests have started for PR 1648. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17425/consoleFull
---
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1434#discussion_r15567741
--- Diff:
extras/spark-kinesis-asl/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/JavaKinesisWordCount.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50577431
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1592#issuecomment-50577608
Yeah, I'm hoping to merge #1346 as soon as it passes Jenkins, so I'd wait
for that.
I also thought Iâd add a couple of notes on what I had in mind with
this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50577707
QA tests have started for PR 1635. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17427/consoleFull
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1562
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1646
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user staple commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1592#issuecomment-50577874
Sure, added the notes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-50578802
Hi @marmbrus, thanks for great work!
But it seems to break build.
I got the following result when I run `sbt assembly` or `sbt publish-local`:
```
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1650#discussion_r15568205
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -377,6 +378,10 @@ private[hive] object HiveQl {
}
protected
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1434#discussion_r15568250
--- Diff:
extras/spark-kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/KinesisWordCount.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1551#discussion_r15568273
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +345,12 @@ private[spark] object PythonRDD extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-50579245
QA results for PR 929:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1650#issuecomment-50579517
QA results for PR 1650:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brcase class
GitHub user naftaliharris opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1652
Avoid numerical instability
This avoids basically doing 1 - 1, for example:
```python
from math import exp
margin = -40
1 - 1 / (1 + exp(margin))
0.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1652#issuecomment-50579636
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1535#issuecomment-50579659
Hey @nkronenfeld - I traced through the exact function call more closely
and I actually think it's fine. The issue I pointed out in the JIRA is
orthogonal. So I'm fine
Github user naftaliharris commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1493#discussion_r15568446
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -63,7 +63,10 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel(LinearModel):
def predict(self, x):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1498#issuecomment-50579747
QA tests have started for PR 1498. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17428/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1538#issuecomment-50579956
LGTM - thanks andrew!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1434#discussion_r15568742
--- Diff:
extras/spark-kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/KinesisWordCount.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1653
[SQL] Fix compiling of catalyst docs.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark fixDocs
Alternatively you can review and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#issuecomment-50580659
QA results for PR 1639:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-50580695
@ueshin thanks for reporting. I've opened #1653 to fix this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1647#issuecomment-50580872
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1653#issuecomment-50580853
QA tests have started for PR 1653. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17429/consoleFull
---
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#discussion_r15568957
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1239,6 +1239,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/** The
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1647#issuecomment-50581178
QA tests have started for PR 1647. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17430/consoleFull
---
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#discussion_r15568992
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1239,6 +1239,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/** The
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1434#discussion_r15568964
--- Diff:
extras/spark-kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1434#discussion_r15568976
--- Diff:
extras/spark-kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#issuecomment-50581291
In case you don't see the hidden comment above: I don't think mapPartitions
would hurt performance here. All you do is pass through the parent's iterator.
When you call
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639#issuecomment-50581349
Basically it's a shorter way of writing what you wrote. Take a look at
MapPartitionsRDD.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50581428
QA results for PR 1635:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1346#issuecomment-50581580
QA results for PR 1346:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1551#discussion_r15569151
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +345,12 @@ private[spark] object PythonRDD extends Logging {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#discussion_r15569238
--- Diff: repl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ReplSuite.scala ---
@@ -256,6 +256,33 @@ class ReplSuite extends FunSuite {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1538
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1346#issuecomment-50582008
Thanks for working on this! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1551#discussion_r15569391
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +345,12 @@ private[spark] object PythonRDD extends Logging {
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1498#discussion_r15569659
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Dependency.scala ---
@@ -36,20 +38,24 @@ abstract class Dependency[T](val rdd: RDD[T]) extends
Serializable
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1551#discussion_r15569680
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +345,12 @@ private[spark] object PythonRDD extends Logging {
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1547#discussion_r15569831
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Logging.scala ---
@@ -110,23 +110,26 @@ trait Logging {
}
private def initializeLogging()
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1498#issuecomment-50583518
QA results for PR 1498:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brabstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50583559
QA tests have started for PR 1635. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17431/consoleFull
---
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1654
Broadcast task sql test [DO NOT MERGE]
This is the same as #1498 but adds a dummy change to sql so I can trigger a
SQL test on Jenkins.
This is not meant to be merged.
You can merge this
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#discussion_r15569917
--- Diff: repl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ReplSuite.scala ---
@@ -256,6 +256,33 @@ class ReplSuite extends FunSuite {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1654#issuecomment-50583989
QA tests have started for PR 1654. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17432/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1547#discussion_r15570127
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Logging.scala ---
@@ -110,23 +110,26 @@ trait Logging {
}
private def initializeLogging()
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1655
[SPARK-2746] Set SBT_MAVEN_PROFILES only when it is not set explicitly b...
...y the user.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1653#issuecomment-50584701
QA results for PR 1653:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1655#issuecomment-50585615
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1346
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1647#issuecomment-50586522
QA results for PR 1647:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50586734
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50586736
QA tests have started for PR 1256. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17434/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1463#issuecomment-50586830
In your example, the reason why there is no annotation on the `A` class is
that it the class is distinct from the companion object. You only created the
companion
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50586938
QA results for PR 1635:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50587212
QA tests have started for PR 1256. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17435/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1654#issuecomment-50587953
QA results for PR 1654:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brabstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1654#issuecomment-50588540
QA results for PR 1654:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brabstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1656#issuecomment-50588923
QA tests have started for PR 1656. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17437/consoleFull
---
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1346#issuecomment-50590014
Thank you @yhuai for the explanation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50590047
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1463#issuecomment-50590574
I changed the patch to first check for presence of annotation on class and
then on object using separate `symbol` for both. Previously I was doing that
because I did
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50590948
QA results for PR 1256:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-50591442
QA results for PR 1290:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brabstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50591525
QA results for PR 1256:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user chutium commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1636#issuecomment-50592256
it seems should be this one?
NullableColumnBuilderSuite.scala
i can do it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1632#discussion_r15573389
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -117,31 +121,45 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
})
Github user chutium commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1612#discussion_r15573636
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/JdbcRDD.scala ---
@@ -81,8 +105,10 @@ class JdbcRDD[T: ClassTag](
logInfo(statement fetch size
Github user chutium commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1612#discussion_r15573659
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/JdbcRDD.scala ---
@@ -67,6 +69,28 @@ class JdbcRDD[T: ClassTag](
}).toArray
}
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1656#issuecomment-50593309
QA results for PR 1656:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1463#issuecomment-50593446
QA tests have started for PR 1463. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17441/consoleFull
---
GitHub user kjsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1657
SPARK-2641: Fixing how spark arguments are loaded from properties file
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kjsingh/spark branch-1.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1657#issuecomment-50594217
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1652#issuecomment-50595894
Y'know, there's a similar issue in `LogisticGradient.scala`, in lines like:
`math.log(1 + math.exp(margin))`
For -40, this gives 0.0, when really it
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1654#issuecomment-50596158
QA results for PR 1654:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brabstract class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1649#discussion_r15575515
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1015,7 +1016,6 @@
idhadoop-2.2/id
properties
hadoop.version2.2.0/hadoop.version
-
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1649#discussion_r15575545
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -111,16 +111,16 @@
java.version1.6/java.version
sbt.project.namespark/sbt.project.name
-
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1649#issuecomment-50597071
I wonder if you can pull out the changes that will also work in Scala 2.10?
some of it looks like some syntactic cleanup which could go in regardless of
the Scala
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1463#issuecomment-50597662
QA results for PR 1463:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1547#discussion_r15576553
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Logging.scala ---
@@ -110,23 +110,26 @@ trait Logging {
}
private def initializeLogging() {
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1547#issuecomment-50599689
No problem, all done, including the stripSuffix change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1547#issuecomment-50600089
QA tests have started for PR 1547. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17442/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1609#issuecomment-50600899
QA tests have started for PR 1609. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17443/consoleFull
---
GitHub user kmader opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1658
Generic Binary File Support in Spark
The additions add the abstract BinaryFileInputFormat and BinaryRecordReader
classes for reading in data as a byte stream and converting it to another
format
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1547#issuecomment-50603304
QA results for PR 1547:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1658#issuecomment-50603528
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659
SPARK-2748 [MLLIB] [GRAPHX] Loss of precision for small arguments to
Math.exp, Math.log
In a few places in MLlib, an expression of the form `log(1.0 + p)` is
evaluated. When p is so small that `1.0
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1652#issuecomment-50603835
See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2748 and
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659 . This could be considered part of
SPARK-2748.
---
If your
1 - 100 of 653 matches
Mail list logo
