Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739434
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739441
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21632/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#discussion_r18739656
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -220,20 +220,44 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739472
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21632/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739473
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2523#issuecomment-58739482
@elmalto It looks like GitHub says that this PR was opened from unknown
repository, which might explain why you're not able to update its code. If
that's the case,
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739516
Oh, I didn't run scalastyle for yarn-alpha.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2344#discussion_r18739665
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -220,20 +220,44 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739525
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21633/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739546
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739545
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21633/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2574#issuecomment-58739664
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21624/consoleFull)
for PR 2574 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2574#issuecomment-58739666
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user lirui-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2760#issuecomment-58739690
Looks great! I think it's very useful to have these async APIs in java :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2675#issuecomment-58739685
@marmbrus This should be ready to go once Jenkins nods.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739709
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21634/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2675#issuecomment-58739744
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21626/consoleFull)
for PR 2675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2675#issuecomment-58739745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739778
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58739777
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21634/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2570#issuecomment-58739817
test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2570#issuecomment-58739815
Seems the failure is not related to this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2759#issuecomment-58739867
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21625/consoleFull)
for PR 2759 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2759#issuecomment-58739870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2570#issuecomment-58739903
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21635/consoleFull)
for PR 2570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58740083
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21636/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2760#issuecomment-58740225
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21628/consoleFull)
for PR 2760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2760#issuecomment-58740227
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762
[SPARK-3904] [SQL] add constant objectinspector support for udfs
In HQL, we convert all of the data type into normal `ObjectInspector`s for
UDFs, most of cases it work, however, some of the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58740431
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58740447
test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58740444
test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58740484
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21637/consoleFull)
for PR 2762 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2760#issuecomment-58740594
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21630/consoleFull)
for PR 2760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2760#issuecomment-58740597
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58740581
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21638/consoleFull)
for PR 2762 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-58740676
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/350/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
Github user tianyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#discussion_r18739877
--- Diff:
sql/hive/compatibility/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-58740718
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-58740717
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21631/consoleFull)
for PR 2538 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2570#issuecomment-58740765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2570#issuecomment-58740758
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21635/consoleFull)
for PR 2570 at commit
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#discussion_r18739911
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -195,22 +241,68 @@ private[history] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2743#issuecomment-58740824
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/351/consoleFull)
for PR 2743 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58741122
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21637/consoleFull)
for PR 2762 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58741124
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-58741172
**[Tests timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/349/consoleFull)**
for PR 2538 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-58741206
**[Tests timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21627/consoleFull)**
for PR 2538 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#issuecomment-58741207
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58741232
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21638/consoleFull)
for PR 2762 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-58741234
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2763
The keys for sorting the columns of Executor page ,Stage page Storage page
are incorrect
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2763#issuecomment-58741803
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2763#issuecomment-58741865
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21639/consoleFull)
for PR 2763 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58741924
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21636/consoleFull)
for PR 2761 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58741926
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2764
[SQL] Refactors data type pattern matching
Refactors/adds extractors for `DataType` and `Binary*` types to ease and
simplify data type related (nested) pattern matching.
You can merge this pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2764#issuecomment-58742036
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2764#issuecomment-58742085
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21640/consoleFull)
for PR 2764 at commit
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#discussion_r18740124
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -195,22 +241,68 @@ private[history] class
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2761#issuecomment-58742157
I quite like standardizing style, but doesn't this have the same problem
mentioned before, that it's going to break a lot of potential merge commits? If
it's
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2743#issuecomment-58742243
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/351/consoleFull)
for PR 2743 at commit
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#discussion_r18740169
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -195,22 +241,68 @@ private[history] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2764#issuecomment-58743015
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2764#issuecomment-58743014
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21640/consoleFull)
for PR 2764 at commit
GitHub user wangxiaojing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765
[spark-3586][streaming]Support nested directories in Spark Streaming
For text files, the method streamingContext.textFileStream(dataDirectory).
The improvement of the streaming to Support
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-58743235
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-58743237
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user james64 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2712#issuecomment-58743254
Can it be that test Flume test failed due to upstream changes? It is
passing for me locally now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2763#issuecomment-58743282
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21639/consoleFull)
for PR 2763 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2763#issuecomment-58743286
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2712#issuecomment-58743306
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21641/consoleFull)
for PR 2712 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740431
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -207,6 +220,9 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740429
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -230,6 +246,10 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740430
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -207,6 +220,9 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740436
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -240,6 +260,31 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740443
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -240,6 +260,31 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740446
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -240,6 +260,31 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740452
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -118,6 +119,18 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#discussion_r18740457
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -195,22 +241,68 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user wangxiaojing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740834
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -118,6 +119,18 @@ class FileInputDStream[K:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2712#issuecomment-58744782
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21641/consoleFull)
for PR 2712 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2712#issuecomment-58744783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user wangxiaojing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740849
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -207,6 +220,9 @@ class FileInputDStream[K:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-58744928
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21642/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#discussion_r18740868
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/TopicModeling.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,674 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r18740883
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -207,6 +220,9 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag, V:
GitHub user cocoatomo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2766
[SPARK-3909][PySpark][Doc] A corrupted format in Sphinx documents and
building warnings
Sphinx documents contains a corrupted ReST format and have some warnings.
The purpose of this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2766#issuecomment-58745151
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21643/consoleFull)
for PR 2766 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2764#discussion_r18740906
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -107,20 +107,20 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2767
[SPARK-3906][SQL] Adds multiple join support for SQLContext
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/liancheng/spark multi-join
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2767#issuecomment-58745472
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2767#issuecomment-58745535
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21644/consoleFull)
for PR 2767 at commit
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#discussion_r18741084
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -195,22 +241,68 @@ private[history] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-58746403
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21642/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-58746407
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2767#issuecomment-58746545
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2767#issuecomment-58746544
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21644/consoleFull)
for PR 2767 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2766#issuecomment-58746606
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2766#issuecomment-58746604
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21643/consoleFull)
for PR 2766 at commit
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
